Avascular Necrosis of the Hip
Pathophysiology
- Final common pathway is microvascular coagulation, leading to:
- Venous congestion
- Retrograde arterial occlusion
- Exact mechanism for each risk factor is unknown
Causes
Common Causes:
1. Corticosteroids – Most frequent
2. Post Traumatic
3. Alcohol
4. Sickle cell disease
5. Caissons disease
Uncommon Causes:
1. Irradiation
2. Smoking
3. HIV
4. Pregnancy
5. Coagulopathies
6. Inflammatory conditions (e.g., SLE)
7. Statins
- Many others: Types of viruses or any state causing increased cortisol
Classification and Management Factors
Ficat System:
1. Stage 1: XR normal, AVN on MRI (pre-collapse)
2. Stage 2: Sclerosis and cyst formation (pre-collapse)
3. Stage 3: Subchondral collapse (crescent sign)
4. Stage 4: Extensive femoral head collapse & acetabular degeneration
Steinberg Classification (Modification of Ficat):
1. Stage 0: Normal XR, MRI & Bone Scan
2. Stage 1: Normal XR, Abnormal MRI or Bone Scan
3. Stage 2: XR features – sclerosis, cysts (pre-collapse)
4. Stage 3: Crescent sign – subchondral collapse
5. Stage 4: Femoral head deformation & flattening
6. Stage 5: Joint space narrowing
7. Stage 6: Advanced degenerative disease
Comparison of Ficat and Steinberg: - Essentially the same, focusing on Stage 3 (crescent sign) as the critical stage. - Steinberg quantifies the degree of collapse and arthrosis better in stages 4, 5, and 6.
Quantification of Head Necrosis
- Multiply the % involvement on AP view by % involved on lateral view
- 50% on both views equates to 25% total volume involved
- (0.5 = 0.25) (25%)
Important Factors in Management Decisions:
- **Size of necrotic lesion**
- **Presence of the crescent sign**
- **Degree of head collapse**
- **Acetabular changes**
Diagnosis
Clinical Presentation: - Groin pain, risk factors, limp, insidious chronic onset
Imaging:
- XR:
Sclerosis & cysts
Crescent sign
Joint space narrowing
Severe arthrosis
- MRI:
99% sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis
Pathognomonic sign: Double line sign (present in 80%)
MR appearances correspond to stage of AVN:
Fat > Blood > Fluid > fibrous tissue = Early > Late disease
High T1, Intermediate T2
High T1, High T2
Low T1, High T2
Low T1, Low T2
Management
Non-Surgical:
- NWB (Non-Weight Bearing), USS (Ultrasound), and ECSW (Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy):
- Not proven to help but useful to try if unfit for surgery
- Bisphosphonates:
- May be helpful in slowing down the rate of head collapse but not currently recommended as first-line treatment
Surgical:
- The treatment of choice as it is proven to alter natural history
- Bone conserving versus Arthroplasty:
- Presence of the crescent sign indicates arthroplasty (unless very small)
- Core Decompression:
- Ficat 1 or 2
- Small to medium necrotic lesion (30% max)
- Reduction of pressure relieves venous congestion
- Encourages neovascularisation
- Cannulated drill or DHS reamer without the proximal large flute
- Drill into the lesion but avoid joint penetration
- Pre-op MRI to outline the area to aim for
- Send reamings for histology
- Some surgeons then insert non-vascularised bone graft up the channel ± BMP to encourage healing
- Not shown to be better than decompression alone
- Results:
- 70% good at up to 8 years
- Smaller the lesion, the better the results
- Not as good for steroid-induced AVN
- Osteotomy:
- Ficat 1-3
- Small localised lesions <50%
- Valgus, varus, or rotational osteotomy depending on location
- Will not work in collapse >50%
- Rarely done in the UK due to issues with:
- Non-union of osteotomy
- Technical difficulty
- Makes THR salvage more difficult
- Results:
- Good reported in Japan and Korea
- Not reproduced in the West
- Vascularised Bone Graft:
- Ficat 1-3
- Lesions <50% in size
- Harvest mid-portion fibula
- Drill and debride the necrotic lesion
- Introducing the fibula into the drill track
- A microvascular anastomosis is then performed between the peroneal vessels and the ascending lateral circumflex artery
- Results:
- Up to 90% success at 5 years in type 1-3 lesions
- Useful for larger size lesions without significant collapse
- Best results still in stage 1 or 2 pre-collapse
- Time-consuming technique requiring a highly skilled team
- Arthroplasty:
- Ficat 3 or 4
- If stage 3 lesion should be of significant size
- Older Patients – single operation
- Results of THR:
- As good for AVN as in OA (Osteoarthritis)
- Avoid if possible in young but still has good outcomes
- Resurfacing contra-indicated
- Arthrodesis:
- An option for very young patients
- Position of fusion is:
- 30 deg flexion
- 0-5 deg external rotation
- 0-5 deg adduction
- Results:
- Not as good as for fusion in OA (Osteoarthritis) – more non-union
- 5% have back pain
- 40% have ipsilateral knee pain
- 20% have contralateral hip pain